IBM has unveiled a new chip design which it says could enable manufacturers to cram 100 billion transistors on a silicon chip the size of a fingernail.
The current industry-standard size for chips, measured in a the unit of nanometres – a billionth of a metre and the size of a few atoms – is around two nanometres (nm).
But IBM claims its new chip tech is the equivalent of around 0.7nm, which may make it the world’s first known chip technology below 1nm.
However, it will be several years before the chip tech could be ready to go into production.
The firm claims in tests, its prototype performed 50% better than its own 2nm chip and was 70% more energy efficient.
It claimed similar boosts in performance when it debuted its 2nm chip tech back in 2021 – saying at the time its tests of those, slightly larger, chips produced similar leaps in performance and energy efficiency.
Jay Gambetta, director of IBM Research and IBM Fellow, described the NanoStack tech as a “landmark moment” for the future of chips.
“With our new NanoStack architecture, we’re not just making smaller transistors, we’re reinventing how chips are built to deliver dramatically more power and energy efficiency,” he said.
In order to try to extend it, rather than try to cram more transistors onto the surface horizontally, chip designers have for some time focused on 3D alternatives, essentially altering the shape of the transistors to make them taller.
IBM’s approach is to layer sheets of them on top of each other as well.
Professor Alan Woodward, a computer scientist at Surrey University, compared it with building a big block of flats rather than houses in a city.
“IBM’s NanoStack is like proposing a 100-storey skyscraper,” he said, adding that in his view, the firm’s closest rivals such as Samsung and Intel are closer to 30-50 storey buildings with their own 3D chip work.
The challenges facing 3D chip designers include heat: the transistors can get hot as they work and heat rises.
Additionally, when the layers between them are too thin, sometimes this prevents them from switching off when they’re supposed to, and this stops the chip from working.
“I think it’s fair to say IBM’s proposals are the most ambitious,” said Prof Woodward.
